On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 01:07:21AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Mon, 27 May 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Scenarios:
> > > 1. Come up with a well-defined criteria for what packages in the release
> > > can be updated. Something like:
> > > Large, important, often-requested packages that have been well-tested
> > > upstream, and have a minimal impact on the rest of the system, and
> > > none on the tasks and boot-floppies system.
> > So no gcc 3.1, no new KDE or Gnome (which I would assume would have a large
> > impact on the tasks), no new dpkg.
> Pretty pretty please, don't say that. Wichert and I are biting at the bit to
> release dpkg 1.10.
I'm well aware :)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
Attachment:
pgpqaRYsugKDQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature