Re: Editor Priorities
m@moshez.org:
> * Not free -200 [changed from -50] XXX
Oh, while we are at it, why not -1000000000 or just forbid non-free
editors to use the "editor" alternatives? :-)
Not that I use pico very much (my usual editor is emacs, in fact, I
have not used pico for a looooong time), but this is not a technical
feature and should only serve to favour a free editor over a non-free
one, provided they have the same features, so -1 would be appropriate.
Users of non-free packages already pay the price of having to retrieve
them from ftp. If you install a non-free editor, presumably it is
because you want to use it.
As I said, I don't care for myself, but I believe the list should
be based on technical merits only.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: