Re: Format for name of .changes file?
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 elf@buici.com wrote:
> I have been using the format
>
> <package>_<version>.changes
>
> The new archive maintenance program (katie?) doesn't like this. It
> does appear to like
>
> <package>_<version>_<architecture>.changes
>
> I don't see a reference to this in the developer's reference or policy
> manual. What are our options? Can the architecture be 'any'? Can it
> be 'source'?
The name of the .changes should not matter at all.
If it does, than katie has a bug. I have no verified this, however.
Reply to: