On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 09:58:46PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Unfortunately, they are NOT inflated. "serious" is the correct severity for > a bug reporting that a package violates a 'must' rule in Debian policy. And > incorrect build-depends are just that. > > What we really need is a way to tag an RC bug as "not to be considered RC, > due to administrative decision of the release manager". And if the > release-manager says so, apply that tag to bugs complaining of broken > arch-indep build-depends. As this might not be RC for the woody distribution, it could be considered RC for the sid. Maybe we should use sid tag for these kind of bugs. I don't see any other bad implications of this, but I have the feeling that I'm overlooking something. (At the moment I'm too busy with other things to research, sorry) Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: jeroen@openprojects
Attachment:
pgpTIGVtDQXD6.pgp
Description: PGP signature