[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITA: tftpd-hpa



* Marco d'Itri (md@Linux.IT) wrote:
> On Feb 19, "Oliver M . Bolzer" <oliver@gol.com> wrote:
> 
>  >I'm going to adopt tftpd-hpa in agreement with the current
>  >maintainer (see #130801). In case anybody objects or has
>  >any other form of input, please speak up now.
> Do we really need two TFTP daemons? Can one of them be killed?

Do we really need two FTP daemons?

Or two shells?

Or two inetd's?

..
(being a bit sarcastic if you hadn't noticed)

	Stephen

Attachment: pgpS4HGdV0ztZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: