Re: policy on start-stop-daemon
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > If something more powerful/flexible is needed (report status,
> > detailed status, uptimes, cleanups, etc.) we should think about
> > a proper structure for that instead of blindly adding more and
> > more options to what should be a simple script to start or stop
> > a service.
>
> Be my guest... I would welcome any ideas on that area. LSB wants us to have
> running status in there, btw.
init.d scripts have no necessary connection to daemons: there may be
many daemons which have no corresponding init.d script, and many
scripts that have no corresponding daemons.
So exactly whose "running status" is it supposed to return?
Reply to: