Re: Proposed New Incoming System

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposed New Incoming System
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 04:44:31 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 877kpjnfn4.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0202092316500.892-100000@yakko.doogie.org> (Adam Heath's message of "Sat, 9 Feb 2002 23:17:42 -0600 (CST)")
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0202092316500.892-100000@yakko.doogie.org>

>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:

 Adam> I've suggested adding new states to the bts: pending-fixed and
 Adam> pending-closed.  When dinstall moves packages to the accept
 Adam> dir, it would set them to the two above states.  When they
 Adam> actually get installed, it sends the normal fixed/closed mails.

	Sounds like the best solution.

	manoj
-- 
 Come quickly, I am tasting stars! Dom Perignon, upon discovering
 champagne.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Proposed New Incoming System
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Joe [and MANY others] doesn't delete its config directory[ies] on purge
Next by Date: ucf 0.02 uploaded to incoming (preserve user changes in config files)
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed New Incoming System
Next by thread: Re: Proposed New Incoming System
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread