Re: A suggestion for the woody freeze
tags 127243 pending
thanks
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:52:02AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Honestly sorry for this mail. It was one of the "you should think before
> you write mails". It isn't my intention to attack you personally. I'm just
> a bit frustrated that you don't answer when I point to things that are
> IMHO real problems like e.g. that we try to get non-frozen packages in a
> relesasable state which means that we are working on a moving target.
>
> ObBug: #126344
Anthony already claimed that one, so this doesn't fulfill the "unique"
requirement.
ObBug: fix in incoming for #127243
--
- mdz
Reply to: