[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A suggestion for the woody freeze



On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:45:26AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:17:20PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:

> > I disagree.  The developer's reference says "you should almost never NMU
> > to unstable, but NMUs to frozen are ok."  This doesn't work if packages 
> > never get to frozen because they're in need of an NMU.

> That's probably just the developer's reference being out of date - I
> imagine that was written before testing appeared.

Well, it's telling that the developer's reference has not been updated.  
I haven't seen any discussion of a new standard for NMUing here on the 
list, and the lists and the developer's reference are about all we have 
to go by.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgpO9A47txmuD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: