[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Will woody ever become stable?



Hello,

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:11:32PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I skimmed the logs for all of the serious and important bugs against
> fdutils, and I didn't see any follow-ups from you.  How long have you been
> planning this?

I planned it about five minutes.  Sorry.
Then I spend some hours to prepare the packages.
I was under the (wrong) impression, that the
maintainer is MIA.

> If you want to clean up the package and take it over, why
> not start by sending information and patches to the BTS?
Sorry, this was because of the short time frame.
Of course I can send all information to the
bug tracking system.

My package is just an offer.  If people agree that my
packages are better then the ones in testing, I could
upload them, and I could take care of them in the
future.  Otherwise we can just ignore my packages or
someone could use them as a base for another NMU.

I do not want to make people angry by "stealing" this
package.

What do you think?

By the way.  For a base package responsiveness of the
package maintainer is an important issue.  If things
come the way that I would care for the package, I
would like to add some "Co-maintainer" to the uploaders
field.  Matt, would you be interested to become fdutils
co-maintainer?

Jochen


P.S.: Vaidhy Mayilrangam <vaidhy@loonys.net> and told me
that I could take over the package.
-- 
                                         Omm
                                      (0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/privat.html

Attachment: pgpZUIOMxH5HX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: