Re: Debian doesn't have to be slower than time.
"Steve M. Robbins" <steven.robbins@videotron.ca> writes:
> No. The difference is that you pick a *short* fixed amount of time
> before the freeze. I'd suggest 2 months.
>
> That forces you to drastically limit the changes to basic things, like
> say, boot floppies. A smaller change has a higher chance of
> stabilizing in a reasonable amount of time (say another 2 months).
> Voila: 3 releases/year.
Sometimes we do want to change major things. In this version of
reality, how would we ever do that?
Reply to: