Re: Will woody ever become stable?
Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>>> But on the other hand if I could upload my package, it would fix some
>>> things and I would try to do my best to respond quickly to any problems
>>> which may occur.
>> Once the NMU'd package gets into testing, it might be reasonable for you to
>> upload your new package (with low urgency) into unstable. That should
>> ensure 20 days of ruthless QA before the new package goes into testing.
> s/20 days/4 days/
> ("urgency=high" means 2 days, doubled it's 4 days)
Matt Zimmerman: "upload your new package (with low urgency) [...]
^^^
ensure 20 days of ruthless QA before the new package goes into
testing"
cu andreas
Reply to: