Re: CD-RW Group, is "generic" always a CD Burner??? (Re: Bug#123550: perms: generic should be set)

To: 123550@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: CD-RW Group, is "generic" always a CD Burner??? (Re: Bug#123550: perms: generic should be set)
From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org>
Date: 12 Dec 2001 11:04:17 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 874rmwp8em.fsf@debian.fire-swamp.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011212162809.GM14968@wiggy.net>
References: <200112112336.fBBNaLUx023543@juniper.intra.microsharp.com> <20011212013028.D3661779@lyta.coker.com.au> <[🔎] 87d71k76ig.fsf_-_@juniper.intra.microsharp.com> <[🔎] 20011212162809.GM14968@wiggy.net>

>>>>> "Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> writes:
    Wichert> It's not, it's just a generic way of accessing SCSI
    Wichert> devices. CD writers are the most popular use for it.

Indeed.  All the audio CD readers I've come across also use the
generic interface. See cdda2wav for instance.

-- 
Stephen

"So if she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood."... "And
therefore?"... "A witch!"

Reply to:

References:
- CD-RW Group, is "generic" always a CD Burner??? (Re: Bug#123550: perms: generic should be set)
  - From: karlheg@microsharp.com (Karl M. Hegbloom)
- Re: CD-RW Group, is "generic" always a CD Burner??? (Re: Bug#123550: perms: generic should be set)
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#123678: general: binutils 2.11.92.0.12.3 cannot link kernel
Next by Date: Packages fields
Previous by thread: Re: CD-RW Group, is "generic" always a CD Burner??? (Re: Bug#123550: perms: generic should be set)
Next by thread: Re: CD-RW Group, is "generic" always a CD Burner??? (Re: Bug#123550: perms: generic should be set)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread