Re: Early draft of release notes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 24. October 2001 13:11, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include <hallo.h>
>
> Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld wrote on Wed Oct 24, 2001 um 12:27:20PM:
> > But will we then have 2.4 in stable? Or does 2.4 have to be delayed until
> > next stable release?
>
> 2.4 is not stable, so it is not suitable as the default kernel,
> IMHO. But into the release notes, we could put something like:
> - distributed with kernel 2.2.x and 2.4.x. Full compliant to both
> kernel generations, the kernel version is your choice.
> This is a PRO for Debian. Some distribution no longer keep backwards
> compatibility.
I agree, but I haven't given up hope that 2.4 might one day become stable.
I'm wondering wether it then will be the default kernel for debian?
That is are there any policy to never change major kernel version in the
stable series? And if so I'd like to know.
- --
Sincerely
Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld
jhf@hex.no
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjvWrlMACgkQCx+ABR2dqkIhYgCaA2zvkh97TsJB/ih42SHkQfnr
IZ4AnR0Y6qs46gX0F1WiRfuY/2OXTMYd
=zUfo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: