Re: LILO
Je 13 May 2001 09:36:54 +1000,
Brian May <bam@debian.org> scribis:
> My proposal was similar to, say /etc/ppp/ip-up.d, where multiple files
> can exist, and all of them are executed.
> [...]
> You could have individual scripts in here to:
>
> - maintain /vmlinuz and /vmlinuz.old symlinks
> - update lilo config (depending on local system policy).
> - run lilo to reinstall boot sector
> - update grub configuration.
How would this keep 2 installed boot loaders from clobbering each
other? A .d directory may have some merits, but how will it help
with:
1. I'm using GRUB, and I want to start using LILO.
2. I'm using GRUB, and I want to install LILO but keep using GRUB.
-itai
Reply to:
- References:
- LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>
- Re: LILO
- From: dth@trinity.hoho.nl (Danny ter Haar)
- Re: LILO
- From: Bryan Andersen <bryan@visi.com>
- Re: LILO
- From: Robert van der Meulen <rvdm@cistron.nl>
- Re: LILO
- From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>
- Re: LILO
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>