Re: LILO
On Thursday 10 May 2001 16:49, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Russell" == Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> writes:
>
> Russell> Kernel images produced by kernel-package depend on lilo.
>
> Say what? Since when has that happened? I see a suggestion on
> an *APPROPRIATE* arch dependent boot loader (silo, milo, etc), but
> never has there been a dependency.
Sorry, I misread the dselect output. It is indees "suggests" as several
people have said.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to:
- References:
- LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>