[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rproxy (Re: WOW! Re: Rsync on servers)



Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:52:38PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> 
> > >>>>> "Adam" == Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:
> > 
> >     Adam> On 11 Nov 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >     >> [snip]
> > 
> >     Adam> Where is this client?  Offloading the cpu usage to the Adam>
> >     client is a huge win.  Also, not requiring a special daemon Adam> on
> >     the server is another plus.
> > 
> > Pity it has problems talking to non-rproxy servers though, including
> > apache, see bug #83603.
> > 
> > I use to use rproxy, but I found it wasn't usable because of this
> > "bug"(???).
> > 
> > Does HTTP define a maximum size for a request?
> 
> I do not think so.  As the error message indicates, it is a server-imposed
> limit.
> 
> Unless the Apache in question is rsync-capable, it's a waste of bandwidth to
> send those headers anyway.

Also doesn't lessen the disk IO and cpu load-

May the source be with you.
                        Goswin



Reply to: