[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libc6 broken?



On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0500, Taral <taral@taral.net> spake forth:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote:
> > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this
> > error-msg:
> > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_mask@GLIBC_2.2.3'
> > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_printf@GLIBC_2.2.3'
> 
> Uh, why do you have libc 2.2.3? We don't have libc 2.2.3 in the archive.

Please see any one of a number of posts by BenC to -devel (and possibly
-mentors; I could be wrong on that one) about it; the current unstable (sid)
libc6 packages are 2.2.3 CVS IIRC.

-- 
Mike Markley <mike@markley.org>
GPG: 0x3B047084 7FC7 0DC0 EF31 DF83 7313  FE2B 77A8 F36A 3B04 7084

It is undignified for a woman to play servant to a man who is not hers.
- Spock, "Amok Time", stardate 3372.7



Reply to: