Re: bwap and teknap
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
[BCC'd to submit@bugs]
I agree; I was thinking of creating an empty transition package, but I
don't think the clutter is called for. Can bwap please be removed from
unstable and/or testing?
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Yotam Rubin wrote:
> Gentle people,
>
> Should we drop the bwap package? I ask this because bwap's official name was
> changed to teknap. There's a package for both clients. Having a package for
> both clients is the same as having different packages for different revisions
> of the same program. This might be desired from time to time, but I don't
> believe it's required here. Having both bwap and teknap exist in the archive
> only increases confusion amongst users.
> The teknap maintainer seems to be aware of this situation and he had provided
> the appropriate "Replaces" and "Conflicts" lines for his package.
> I think dropping bwap from the distribution is in order.
>
> Regards, Yotam Rubin
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: