[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Questionable conffile handling in connection with debconf



On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 06:30:44PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> As I understand
> policy (see the excerpt at the end of this message), conffiles should never be
> modified in maintainer scripts.  Configuration files should be distributed as
> part of the package (either as conffiles or not), or else created and managed
> by maintainer scripts, but not both.  

If a configuration is shipped as part of the package it *must* be declared
as a conffile, otherwise the user's changes will be lost on upgrade. But
otherwise, yes.

> Quoth the Policy [section 4.7.3]:
> This implies that the default version
> will be part of the package distribution, and must not be modified by the
                                                ^^^^^^^^
> maintainer scripts during installation (or at any other time).

Thus you should file a serverity: serious bug against these packages, and
they need to be fixed before release.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

     ``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
                       -- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001

Attachment: pgpRQ59rlgPPq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: