On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 08:24:54PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 07:41:11PM +0200 , Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > Hi,
> > might there be a bug in the glibc 2.1.95 containing 2.1.94 in
> > the shlibdeps file in /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlib ?
>
> why? is 2.1.95 not compatible with 2.1.94?
>
It should - But do glibc 2.1.95 linked/compiled binarys able to run under
2.1.94 ?
But Ben just told me that the ABI didnt change so that statement was correct.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912
Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?