On 00-04-29 Luis Casillas wrote: > > > The arla packages are based on version 0.23, which is several versions > > > behind the latest one (0.32 at current). The bug tracking system page > > > for arla shows many bugs that have been unaddressed for a very long > > > time (more than a year). > > > > Well, as potato has been frozen for a some time now, we can't add new > > upstream packages to it. New Upstream version have to go in woody. It > > would only be possible to backport the fixes from 0.32 to 0.23. > Well, potato hasn't been frozen for a year. And it shouldn't become frozen for a year as we want to try to release as soon as possible. > > > More importantly, arla-modules is built only for kernel 2.0.36, which > > > is not the default kernel for potato, and making the source package > > > build for a different kernel is not trivial. (I tried to modify the > > > source package to build for kernel 2.2.13, but ran into complications > > > since the system, following the standard include files, insists in > > > building a package for 2.2.14.) > > > > Hm, what errors exactly? I think fixing this bug for potato should be > > possible. Otherwise we could think about removing it from potato, but > > this decision should be made by the release-manager. > If I remember correctly, it had to do with the fact that the libc6-dev > installs its own version of the kernel include files, and somewhere in > there there's a #define that makes the module build process believe it > has to build a kernel for 2.2.14. I played around for 45 minutes with > the package control files, but when I realized that I was doing all > that work just to get a very outdated version of arla to work, I gave > up. I just grabbed the newest source tarball and built it, and I'm > quite happy that way. > I was thinking that removing it from potato would make sense. I > personally don't see the sense of including an ancient version of > pre-alpha software. Well it's up to our release-manager or the maintainer itself to make the final descision, but after reading your comments above, I would also think that removing it from potato and putting the new version in woody seems to be good solution. Ciao Christian -- Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
Attachment:
pgpP7YM7NiQMB.pgp
Description: PGP signature