Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
From: Colin Walters <levanti@verbum.org>
Date: 13 Feb 2000 17:21:55 -0500
Message-id: <87k8k84ubg.fsf@meta.verbum.org>
In-reply-to: ressu@uusikaupunki.fi's message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2000 21:24:17 +0200"
References: <20000213212417.F500@zanaga.uusikaupunki.fi>

>>>>> "ressu" == ressu  <ressu@uusikaupunki.fi> writes:

    ressu> ok, lets face it.. the packages file in slink is something
    ressu> like <500K (in i386) in potato its >800K.. i think it might
    ressu> be time to start splitting it up... 

Totally off subject, but isn't it great that there is enough free
software that we're complaining about how big a list of all of it is?

-- 
Colin Walters <levanti@verbum.org>
http://web.verbum.org/levanti
(1024D/C207843A) A580 5AA1 0887 2032 7EFB  19F4 9776 6282 C207 843A

Reply to:

References:
- should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
  - From: ressu@uusikaupunki.fi

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal (was: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody))
Next by Date: Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal (was: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody))
Next by thread: Re: should we split up the Packages file in main (for woody)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread