[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Device detection?



On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Stephen Crowley wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 07:37:49PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Previously Stephen Crowley wrote:
> > > Yes, I was wondering if it would be possible to do a brute force scan for
> > > some older legacy hardware. Just cycle through the i/o and irq ports for
> > > some commonly used hardware. Some devices might lock up on this though, so
> > > they would have to be installed manually.
> > 
> > No way, this will certainly crash lots of systems..
> 
> Of course, that's why I said it should only be used on devices which wont
> lock up systems.

But how do you auto detect a device that locks up your system when you
probe for it?  This is the reason for windows throwing you into safe mode,
no auto detection because you probably crashed from a misguided auto
detect.  I prefer linux's way of telling the kernel what you have.  But, I
guess someone could make a package that just mod-probes the heck out of
your system with every option until you crash or the modprobe succeeds.

Brandon

+---                                                                     ---+
| Brandon Mitchell  bmitch@atdot.org  http://bmitch.dhis.org/  ICQ 30631197 |
| Throughout history, UNIX systems have regularly been broken into, beaten, |
| brutalized, corrupted, commandeered, compromised, and illegally fscked.   |
|                                    -- UNIX System Administration Handbook |


Reply to: