On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 12:13:54AM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> The goals that are often heard are too general, `libc x.xx', etc. Why don't
> we divide (sort of) Debian in communities[1], just for release/status
> management. Each community would be a set of packages, maybe a leader (or
> not), a subpolicy, etc.
Otherwise known as creating mailing lists for the different areas, and
having a goal `sponsor' to tell the release manager what's happening,
and how much more has to happen before release, and such like. Richard's
already doing this, more or less.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.
``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it
results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
-- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
pgpwxK6sYYqp7.pgp
Description: PGP signature