Re: libstdc++2.8 is missing from slink
jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl writes:
> Which is of course the wrong way around. The correct reasoning would have
> been: egcs no longer creates libstdc++2.8, but as packages still depend on
> that, we keep the libstdc++2.8 package and it source around.
Human nature being what it is, packages which depend on libstdc++2.8
won't be recompiled for a long time. By removing the package, we
force the issue. The unstable distribution need not be consistent.
Guy
Reply to: