Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
On Tue, 25 Aug 1998 11:12:59 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
>Why are we arguing about this ?
I agree.
> 1) There is no useful difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0 r1
> 2) It would be better to have 2.0 r? for marketing reasons
I can't believe that anything wins because of "marketing reasons". What
are we, Microsoft?
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reply to: