Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before releasing Hamm
On Fri, Mar 20, 1998 at 10:57:12AM +0100, jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl wrote:
> The policy on version numbers for non-maintainer releases prevents this.
> If the latest maintainer release was 1.1, the first non-maintainer release
> will be 1.1-1, whereas the next maintainer release will be 1.2; thus, to
> dinstall the new maintainer release is newer than the non-maintainer
> release and it will happily install the new maintainer release.
On Fri, Mar 20, 1998 at 01:05:26PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
> jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl writes:
> > will be 1.1-1,
>
> Actually, isn't it 1-1.1?
Hmmm. My example was flawed; it should have had debian revisions separated
by a hypen.
Let's try it again:
- Latest maintainer release: 1.2.3-1
- Non-maintainer followup: 1.2.3-1.1
- New maintainer release: 1.2.3-2
HTH,
Ray
--
UNFAIR Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried
to cheat them out of and didn't manage. See also DISHONESTY, SNEAKY,
UNDERHAND and JUST LUCKY I GUESS.
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: