Re: HAMM FREEZE IS ONE WEEK AWAY
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Brian White wrote:
> Perhaps I should have said "simply recompiled for the new architecture".
> I was just thinking that there was no new code (a few arch patches would
> be okay, though) in that version.
Ok...I thought that was what you meant...Just wanted to confirm that :)
> Hmmm... I couldn't really say. I think everything that has a priority
> of "essential", "required", "standard", or "important" should be there.
> Beyond that, as much as possible though not necessary.
That's my goal. I'm already within a day of having all of the required's
knocked out. Standard may take a little longer, but most of my backlog is
in "optional". There are a couple of things I would *love* to get
finished, though (useful things like Samba, etc) which are techically
"optional", but are so useful that to not have them would almost negate
most of an Alpha's usefulness as a Linux box.
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to listmaster@debian.org .
Reply to: