On Sat, Dec 12, 1998 at 02:42:37AM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > I suggested Debian for a server in university and told them all the advantages > - along with other things of the BTS of course. Too bad they really looked at > it... They told me that they would not consider such a buggy distribution as > the operating system for a server. ?? What major bugs exist in hamm? All important bugs were fixed before release. Individual packages do contain other less important bugs, yes, but with so many packages, that's not surprising. Remember, we don't write the upstream software, and it isn't a maintainer's responsibility to fix bugs in the upstream source. I have a box here running hamm, up for 186 days, there are no bugs in my day to day work on the machine (it does PPP, email (smail+mutt+qpopper, recently upgraded to exim), web (Apache, Apache-ssl)), etc). Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5 CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
Attachment:
pgphJKDrsgiai.pgp
Description: PGP signature