[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: upstreams maintainer conflict, was: wget: remove outdated manual page



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On 15 May 1998, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:

[ Many points on Texinfo vs SGML elided because I don't have sufficient
  technical knowledge to comment on them. ]


>5) Finally, what does this buy us?  Texinfo is not a perfect system,
>   but it works reasonably well.  Moving to SGML should be accompanied 
>   by a true gain in functionality.

    Well, the idea was for it to create a common format that could
create both info format output and manpage format from a single
source, so that people who like manpages can get the information they
need there.


>   So far most of the complaints to Info in favor of man were related
>   to the lack of a good text-based standalone Info reader (the one
>   shipped by the FSF is horrible, and not only for the bindings.)

    Well, part of it is that when I'm scanning for data, I kind of
like just hitting page-down until something catches my eye.  This is
something I can't do if I'm navigating multiple levels of links.  I
find myself going through section after section in info emacs20 trying
to find things sometimes (of course here, the documentation is so
massive, having a manpage wouldn't help, but maybe it helps show what
I mean).


>   Let's not confuse the two very different issues -- if it is the
>   reader that is broken, then the reader should be fixed.  I've never
>   heard an Emacs users complain on Info.

    You just did :) I use Emacs for everything from writing email to
word processing (via LaTeX/AucTeX).  I still don't like info :) That
may say more about my (lack of) skill with Emacs/Info than about the
software itself, but the comment stands :)

=============================================================================
 Zed Pobre <zed@va.debian.org>  |  PGP key on servers, fingerprint on finger
=============================================================================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBNVx2c9wPDK/EqFJbAQFQIAf9G7Bgt3YBn3dXcnP7L4lN/EClHghzO2NF
7Jbvhq3R2e4rArrmZGmHX95+CfkUjvqKahspasAPcQ66T5xWbBrvp4jsqPSLjJxy
t2AK1YBEyCxGrwZXtuQgUbg51Xo44i6Pl5v1AzHy5tu9jx1piWSPtjUnk4z9xyio
xe5e/IpVOI26+GHlhPPQuSbFZFJI2RoZ9yo98ZzxEYVZFh0pwIIVPfIHc+vRqRr5
iOXyOXw/m/vtS6dRh2LYGN7lZOqX/jCIxEplslkIHH7WbgRutghoe8G4zN5ISAUN
pbp1kGJCxumVrBvxCBmd+YCxVNnJgj4d3Auso2kHy08M9PckVn1avQ==
=uKg8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: