RE: "Visual" IDE? - You mean Emacs
Ehem, and how about xemacs? :-)
No, not that I'm nitpicking, I don't use either and like to know the
(dis-)advantages of both, since I consider a switch.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Betts [SMTP:edward@hairnet.demon.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 1998 10:08 PM
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: "Visual" IDE? - You mean Emacs
>
> On Sun, 10 May, 1998, Gregory S. Stark wrote:
> >
> > SEGV <mlepage@cgocable.net> writes:
> >
> > > I understand that Visual Studio was created for the lowest common
> > > denominator (that's a fact, not an opinion), and that UNIX
> programmers
> > > are more comfortable with makefiles and command lines. But you
> have to
> > > admit that Visual Studio, and Metrowerks Codewarrior, are great
> IDEs.
> > >
> > > My question is, "Why is there nothing similar on UNIX?"
> >
> > Generally the IDE systems confuse "integration" with closed
> monolithic design.
> > Just compare what unix accomplishes with simple protocols like the
> EDITOR
> > environment variable and the +lineno argument, compared with the
> baroque VS
> > extension API. Personally I have used VS and I would much prefer
> Emacs with
> > M-x gdb and M-x compile.
>
> Emacs is the only IDE, there is no other way of doing it.
>
> --
> Edward Betts http://www.hairnet.demon.co.uk/
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: