On Mon, May 11, 1998 at 10:03:58AM +0000, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote: > Has anyone packaged this? I would have, but I couldn't get 2.8 + SSL to Could you enclose the URL for th epatch? > compile for some reason (think I know why too) and I couldn't officially > maintain the thing anyway since I don't live in the free world. As far as I know the patches that make lynx use SSL are only available in the non-free world (U.S.) so we have a problem having it maintained in the "free world". > The number one complaint I hear about lynx is no SSL support. There is also another way, Lalo once tried to package it: eassl and edssl. The last I remember is either only available in the non-free world or unusable copyright - I don't remember. Lalo, your turn. Regards, Joey -- / Martin Schulze * joey@infodrom.north.de * 26129 Oldenburg / / The good thing about standards is / / that there are so many to choose from. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum /
Attachment:
pgpLnN9POBfmq.pgp
Description: PGP signature