Removing Packages from Hamm (was: Can we upload binaries using libc6 to hamm yet?)

[Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>]

> I don't see the point in doing that. If we have already decided hamm to be
> libc6-based, all packages, sooner or later, must be re-compiled to use
> libc6.
> 
> Brian, after libc6 being installed in unstable, will you report a zillion
> bugs against all packages requiring a recompile? [ This would also serve
> as a developer-ping ].

I wonder if it's worth removing _everything_ from binary-(arch) within hamm
until it gets re-uploaded again.  We'd then disallow all packages that
depend on libc5.

Thoughts?
                                          Brian
                                 ( bcwhite@verisim.com )

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Generated by Signify v1.02.  For this and more, visit http://www.verisim.com/



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .