On Apr 22, Justus Pendleton wrote : Unfortunately, I could find nothing in debian-policy 2.1.3.0 (the : most recent I found) that says anything about bash being required. : Of course, it is required...but only because the maintainer gave it : that priority. And I think, it's ok. Should we stay on the old V7 /bin/sh, only to keep _all_ /bin/*sh* users happy? Just understand bash as YET ANOTHER SCRIPTING LANGUAGE ... like perl, awk, TCL, ... : Circumventing the sh link isn't all that bad. I've been doing it for a : while now and all of the problems that arose were because people used : bash-isms. In it's current state, trying to completely remove bash from These bash-isms make at least some programmers live somewhat easier. Probably it should be suggested/recommended/enforced, that every bash-ism using script starts with ``#! /bin/bash'' rather then with ``#! /bin/sh'' Heiko -- email : heiko@lotte.sax.de heiko@debian.org heiko@sax.de pgp : A1 7D F6 7B 69 73 48 35 E1 DE 21 A7 A8 9A 77 92 finger: heiko@sax.sax.de heiko@master.debian.org
Attachment:
pgpGbEYZWzmt6.pgp
Description: PGP signature