READ THIS and stop deciding for us what we mean...
> what two arguments? all i've heard from you so far is that you don't like
> the dfsg.
This is entirely not my point. And, since you do not see fit to read all the
mails I have posted or are somehow simply incapable of comprehending the
simple expressions of english speech I have used within, please don't respond
again! And if you must write, try to do so with intelligence and thought, not
mindless ideology.
But, for the record:
1. I have no problem with the DFSG as a whole (in fact, were some other
changes made, I would actually be in favor of making it stricter)
2. I am not making a big fuss over nothing -- as a Debian developer it is my
responsiblity as yours to speak up where you feel needed.
3. Go read Milan Zamazal's message subjected "Is Debian Ideology?" -- it is a
pretty good reflexion of my actual concerns and not those which simply surface
due to your debian fears
4. Or Chris Lameter's recent message "Free Software orientation NOT at stake"
-----
Brought to you by the letters E and K and the number 9.
Paul J. Thompson <thomppj@thomppj.student.okstate.edu>
<http://thomppj.student.okstate.edu/~thomppj/>
--
-----
Brought to you by the letters P and N and the number 16.
Paul J. Thompson <http://thomppj.student.okstate.edu/~thomppj/>
<thomppj@thomppj.student.okstate.edu>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: