Re: What about a user-contrib directory?
On Tue, Oct 21, 1997 at 05:35:56AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > What's wrong with following "unstable" if you want to be at the bleeding
> > edge?
> >
> This is definitely too much bleeding edge if one simply wants a
> functioning system with more recent software. Following unstable
> means at least migration to libc6 and therefore probably lots of
In all fairness though, the hamm upgrade is a little different
to buzz -> rex, rex -> bo for example. It was quite practical to run
unstable rex packages on buzz and bo packages on rex for example.
Is it necessary to establish a policy for handling this when it
should not occur that often?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust hamish@debian.org, hmoffatt@mail.com
Student, computer science & computer systems engineering. 3rd year, RMIT.
http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here) CPOM: [***** ] 56%
The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. --Bohr
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: