[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: question about package building



On Thu, 23 Jan 1997, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:

sgk >1.  When I run deb-make, it creates a debian/control file with the
sgk >field Architecture set to "any".  I have edited this to reflect the 
sgk >architecture on which I'm building the package.  But I notice that
sgk >only a few of the other debian source packages I've looked at have
sgk >an Architecture field set to anything but "any".  Now, I realize
sgk >that packages which are basically scripts might reasonably be
sgk >set to "any", but I don't understand why so many packages with 
sgk >compiled programs should be set to "any", since I doubt that many
sgk >of them were actually built with cross-compilers.  What's going on here?

"any" means the package can potentially be build on any platform. I.e. the
source code is not i386 specific.

sgk >2.  In the [good, old] days, I used to run 
sgk >   dpkg --print-architecture 
sgk >in order to assure that the architecutre for a package was set correctly.
sgk >Why doesn't deb-make do this too?

Because "any" will be replaced by the correct architecture when you build
the package. Do a "debc" and see.

--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
Please always CC me when replying to posts on mailing lists.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com


Reply to: