Accepted ckport 0.1~rc1-4 (source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:20:24 +0200
Source: ckport
Binary: ckport ckport-database
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1~rc1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Changed-By: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Description:
ckport - portability analysis and security checking tool
ckport-database - portability analysis and security checking tool (Database files)
Closes: 723959
Changes:
ckport (0.1~rc1-4) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Fix dh_auto_clean.
Closes: #723959
Checksums-Sha1:
a00c97abd64ab7fb520a516a3c1e267cb54d0c3b 1764 ckport_0.1~rc1-4.dsc
5e2ea8a4f07feb8bb3af061395cb36a52873bb0c 2461 ckport_0.1~rc1-4.debian.tar.gz
ca674884f0e5ec51a1b98d16aade5a179797b63c 8956 ckport_0.1~rc1-4_all.deb
5b860281165d95cf5c8886ec26a5c4424f9b66da 5772 ckport-database_0.1~rc1-4_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
79cbb20ea7001f94de0cbb5c2caa54d759b03e52fd1778b5423a039fb4501622 1764 ckport_0.1~rc1-4.dsc
2eb19ca483a4b84f480d653a4d9b6208a504c869c25157c6bdb3192a4c81cc3a 2461 ckport_0.1~rc1-4.debian.tar.gz
8bbb90323e0ae1d101ae2ff530eac11e27ba62124e35143d7011497d3056fc87 8956 ckport_0.1~rc1-4_all.deb
a8ec6dbef03db65abac8813c4a7b6de3a417558509a4b669b92248e5f46586b9 5772 ckport-database_0.1~rc1-4_all.deb
Files:
f81303440331f8394b8917999a645477 1764 devel optional ckport_0.1~rc1-4.dsc
9135568612a2945399570dcc8b1183bb 2461 devel optional ckport_0.1~rc1-4.debian.tar.gz
77bc5031d9e7de604a3e933e2787bd2c 8956 devel optional ckport_0.1~rc1-4_all.deb
1c313abca38b7b4d04bb129983190041 5772 devel optional ckport-database_0.1~rc1-4_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=lgB1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: