[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted maildir-utils 0.6-2 (source amd64)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:54:55 +0900
Source: maildir-utils
Binary: maildir-utils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>
Changed-By: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>
Description: 
 maildir-utils - Set of utilities to deal with Maildirs (upstream name mu)
Closes: 568668
Changes: 
 maildir-utils (0.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * make mu index -q really silent, patch by Michael Guntsche
     (Closes: #568668)
   * bump standards version to 3.8.4, no changes necessary
   * add a README.source file in debian/
Checksums-Sha1: 
 d596f001f70ecc158d37aeee018b08b98dd5417b 1230 maildir-utils_0.6-2.dsc
 e2cc2b2cb3e60a7a6025d9b91d228066e5a0bd23 3912 maildir-utils_0.6-2.diff.gz
 4c802cb03ea93d5246468c822473eff1146b1ace 42904 maildir-utils_0.6-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 3e5be324a9fb2814b850d678b5c8c69b383c2ea05f3667ca4524c31a905b53c6 1230 maildir-utils_0.6-2.dsc
 29ad37eb31b46901599b656afaaf7f2dac6426c3811247902398ddba6d9d83ca 3912 maildir-utils_0.6-2.diff.gz
 7af31cbbd1a52c970818ecb3d0cb131ea82467bd6c33a01fb58728db620e763c 42904 maildir-utils_0.6-2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 6387dd4f7fd62b72cb9d8f7afd433acf 1230 mail optional maildir-utils_0.6-2.dsc
 43daf7de1db67ee1b8847d7021bcfc91 3912 mail optional maildir-utils_0.6-2.diff.gz
 e3822cfc3d09162032edc967a72d9643 42904 mail optional maildir-utils_0.6-2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLc6r/0r9KownFsJQRAo2vAKCKpWpp/Gn8pCh76GggUgfQ3ylQfwCfa2IQ
RpFB5NnwyzUVLl9JNTTUM0E=
=dKnB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
maildir-utils_0.6-2.diff.gz
  to main/m/maildir-utils/maildir-utils_0.6-2.diff.gz
maildir-utils_0.6-2.dsc
  to main/m/maildir-utils/maildir-utils_0.6-2.dsc
maildir-utils_0.6-2_amd64.deb
  to main/m/maildir-utils/maildir-utils_0.6-2_amd64.deb


Reply to: