Accepted rxvt-unicode 2.0-1 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:18:52 +0100
Source: rxvt-unicode
Binary: rxvt-unicode-ml rxvt-unicode rxvt-unicode-lite
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>
Changed-By: Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>
Description:
rxvt-unicode - RXVT-like terminal emulator with Unicode support
rxvt-unicode-lite - RXVT-like terminal emulator with basic Unicode support
rxvt-unicode-ml - multi-lingual terminal emulator with Unicode support for X11
Changes:
rxvt-unicode (2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
+ workarounds to build with gcc (<< 3.2)
+ build fixes for non-XIM/XFT config (disabled build_fixes dpatch)
* 02_extra_xdefaults.dpatch: fixed to merge correctly
Files:
e2b4c7d7a8b6835b8351468bfa5cb097 708 x11 optional rxvt-unicode_2.0-1.dsc
6bd09d78f1f559ffec3fb17d753eac4e 1172265 x11 optional rxvt-unicode_2.0.orig.tar.gz
6d4668ac292422210a0cc05667ff7b03 6410 x11 optional rxvt-unicode_2.0-1.diff.gz
777a734af1216f928d20f496fc90b329 194804 x11 optional rxvt-unicode_2.0-1_i386.deb
1b1e1a6610d8eddac318d971a0eb42d7 1111984 x11 optional rxvt-unicode-ml_2.0-1_i386.deb
912469d36f69b3862a055e00c054b104 194682 x11 optional rxvt-unicode-lite_2.0-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAQ0op4QZIHu3wCMURAp9TAJ9I0V8UXFanOI6Ws00KGa1W6UzDygCfRBUN
28IRVK2WlBY0m6f42llGh8U=
=4+um
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
rxvt-unicode-lite_2.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode-lite_2.0-1_i386.deb
rxvt-unicode-ml_2.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode-ml_2.0-1_i386.deb
rxvt-unicode_2.0-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode_2.0-1.diff.gz
rxvt-unicode_2.0-1.dsc
to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode_2.0-1.dsc
rxvt-unicode_2.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode_2.0-1_i386.deb
rxvt-unicode_2.0.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode_2.0.orig.tar.gz
Reply to: