Installed exim 3.03-5 (source i386)
Installed:
exim_3.03-5.dsc
to dists/potato/main/source/mail/exim_3.03-5.dsc
replacing exim_3.03-4.dsc
exim_3.03-5_i386.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/mail/exim_3.03-5.deb
replacing exim_3.03-4.deb
exim_3.03-5.diff.gz
to dists/potato/main/source/mail/exim_3.03-5.diff.gz
replacing exim_3.03-4.diff.gz
eximon_3.03-5_i386.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/mail/eximon_3.03-5.deb
replacing eximon_3.03-4.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.6
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 19:11:33 +0000
Source: exim
Binary: eximon exim
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.03-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Baker <mbaker@iee.org>
Description:
exim - Exim Mailer
eximon - X-windows monitor for the exim mail transport agent.
Changes:
exim (3.03-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Local/Makefile: don't link with libwrap any more; it causes too many
problems for people upgrading (#50250)
* debian/config: don't include userforward or procmail directors in
satellite configuration (#40570)
* debian/crontab: only run queue if /etc/exim.conf exists (#43419)
* debian/rules, debian/ipv6.sh, OS/Makefile-Default: Fix so IPv6 support
is only included if available, so exim will build on m68k (#50435)
* debian/config: exit if not run as root (#50543)
* debian/config: don't comment out the example rewrite rule: it is
sufficiently widely used, at least for dialups, that it should be in
by default (#49202)
Files:
f4677aeefe289c1a899173d8ea07465a 608 mail optional exim_3.03-5.dsc
5b2049cfc624c54e69e82c6527a6842b 85497 mail optional exim_3.03-5.diff.gz
51036404b81e474bed5115a9a9034042 615178 mail optional exim_3.03-5_i386.deb
33c785399af4d40357fda6e772d58832 38710 mail optional eximon_3.03-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBOEAtZUEtwElKs1mxAQE8mwP/QwgW61e+anW0TSJkJzXdEwNjTxH5O30g
SSkk4Qpn05V7P5XZvFieOsP1RLDHirajxs8IdADC7eQ1zWn6ba85hgXR+LdfxoMc
9FO2WPb+AQ2CsqV1hIsZlzxxSZivI2g7wt0zWfz2xMHkWVTSMOgYkvr4miX5wvRv
owSNqFgH0bg=
=Ab6x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: