On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 01:52:58PM -0500, Mike Markley wrote: > Replacing regular ol' non-free ssh is all fine and dandy with me, but it > seems to me that a better approach would be to name the sucker openssh and > have it provide/replace/conflict with just plain old "ssh". Fewer > surprises when it comes time for an apt-get upgrade. Just my $0.02... I agree. -- Raul