[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: some statistics on using bz2 for packages



On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 05:50:50PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> I took the (immense amount of) time do some real testing on using bz2 for
> packages.

Just a note that no one seems to have mentioned: this requires making
bzip2 essential, at least for packages compressed with bzip2. Having
those packages Pre-Depend on bzip2 isn't even entirely strong enough ---
dpkg can't even cope with a dpkg-dev --contents request without bzip2
installed. Adding `dpkg [Pre-]Depends: bzip2' would fix it, though. (dpkg
doesn't currently formally depend on gzip, however)

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.

 ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it 
        results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
                                        -- Linus Torvalds

Attachment: pgpLh4OYfG8FR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: