Dependency Bugs in Debian Packages

[Bob Hilliard <hilliard@flinet.com>]

gecko@master.debian.org writes:

> Please take a look at this list and fix your package if it's on here.  (Or,
> you can explain why it should be allowed to violate policy or isn't
> violating policy).  There *could* be bogus reports in here, too.  In a week
> or two, we'll file Bugs against packages that are still unaddressed.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         --snip--
>    This list was generated from the hurd-i386 Packages file,
>    dated: Thu Aug 5 19:15:28 1999.
>    
>    It excludes the checks which were already reported for the i386
>    architecture.
>    
>   Cannot satisfy with packages in main:
>      * dict-elements: recommendations dictd, dict
>      * dict-foldoc: recommendations dictd, dict
>      * dict-web1913: recommendation dictd
                         --snip--

     These packages passed your scan for i386, but failed on the
Hurd.  It appears to me that the the binaries, dict and dictd, have
not yet been ported to the Hurd.  I do not believe that is a bug
against my packages.

Bob     
-- 
   _
  |_)  _  |_       Robert D. Hilliard    <hilliard@flinet.com>
  |_) (_) |_)      Palm City, FL  USA    PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9