Re: mutt signatures (was Re: Volume on -devel) [ot]
On Mar 19, Jonathan P Tomer <phouchg@cif.rochester.edu> wrote:
>sorry for the clutter, but that brings up a question i had wanted to
>ask... is the application/pgp-signature thing that mutt does any kind
>of standard at all? it's unfriendly to mhshow/mh-e, and i'm planning
Yes, it is, but it's still difficult handling it with a script.
(Perl code for doing that is welcome... If anyone cares I wrote a perl
module for signing and verifying messages with GPG.)
--
ciao,
Marco
Reply to: