[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gnome-apt worry



Mitch Blevins wrote:

> In foo.debian-devel, you wrote:
>
> > Hmmm.
> > 
> > # apt-get install gnome-apt
> > Updating package status cache...done
> > Checking system integrity...ok
> > The following extra packages will be installed:
> >   gdk-imlib1 libungif3g imlib-base apt libesd0 
> > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> >   gdk-imlib1 libungif3g imlib-base gnome-apt libesd0 
> > 1 packages upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 145 not upgraded.
> > Sorry, but the following packages are broken - this means they have unmet
> > dependencies:
> >   gnome-apt: Depends:libart2 Depends:libglib1.1.13 Depends:libgnome31 Depen
> ds:libgtk1.1.13 Depends:libzvt2 Depends:zlib1g
> 
> Hmmm.
> 
> # dpkg --print-avail libart2 |egrep '^Filename:'
> Filename: dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/libs/libart2_0.99.4-2.deb
> 
> # echo 'etc, etc...'
> etc, etc...
> 
> # egrep -v "^#" /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://www.debian.org/~mblevin/gnome-apt ./
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
> 
> # echo "Have you tried another mirror?"
> Have you tried another mirror?

Thanks for that funny reply.

Strangely, using the same sources.list as you, I still get :

# dpkg --print-avail libart2 
Package `libart2' is not available.

However, `apt-get install gnome-apt' now appears to work!

# apt-get install gnome-apt
Updating package status cache...done
Checking system integrity...ok
The following extra packages will be installed:
  gdk-imlib1 libglib1.1.13 libungif3g libzvt2 libgnorba27 zlib1g libjpeg62
  libgtk1.1.13 imlib-base gnome-bin libgnome31 apt libesd0 liborbit0 libart2 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gdk-imlib1 libglib1.1.13 libungif3g libzvt2 libgnorba27 libjpeg62
  libgtk1.1.13 imlib-base gnome-bin gnome-apt libgnome31 libesd0 liborbit0
  libart2 
2 packages upgraded, 14 newly installed, 0 to remove and 314 not upgraded.
Need to get 2343k of archives. After unpacking 4859k will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]

Peter


Reply to: