Re: Debian appears to be ancient

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Debian appears to be ancient
From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
Date: 19 Jan 1999 19:59:41 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87pv8apuuq.fsf@hasler.dhh>
In-reply-to: Edward Betts's message of "Tue, 19 Jan 1999 22:44:04 +0000"
References: <[🔎] 19990118154022.A2921@cs.leidenuniv.nl> <[🔎] 87sod8h99j.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu> <[🔎] 19990119143732.G3392@cs.leidenuniv.nl> <[🔎] 19990119224404.C29506@hairnet.demon.co.uk>

Edward Betts writes:
> Are you sure it was /usr/doc/copyright/base ?

hasler/~ ll /usr/doc/copyright/base
total 2
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root         1197 Dec 31  1969 debian.README
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian appears to be ancient
  - From: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>

References:
- Debian appears to be ancient
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cs.leidenuniv.nl>
- Re: Debian appears to be ancient
  - From: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: Debian appears to be ancient
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl>
- Re: Debian appears to be ancient
  - From: Edward Betts <edward@hairnet.demon.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian goes big business?
Next by Date: Re: Debian appears to be ancient
Previous by thread: Re: Debian appears to be ancient
Next by thread: Re: Debian appears to be ancient
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread