Re: what about Pine's license?
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jan 1999 theone@ihug.co.nz wrote:
>
> <...> Pine is simpler to use,
> > but it's a pity about the license.
>
> Go on, please.
It's non-free - you can't distribute modified binaries.
'nuff said
Matthew
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Steward of the Cambridge Tolkien Society
Selwyn College Computer Support
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Chamber/8841/
http://www.cam.ac.uk/CambUniv/Societies/tolkien/
http://pick.sel.cam.ac.uk/
Reply to: