Re: make mutt the `standard' mail reader
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 02:01:22PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 02:49:46PM +0000, Edward Betts wrote:
> > does anyone still use elm?
> > why don't we make elm optional, and mutt standard.
>
> Because elm is one of those things that should always be there on a
> system even marginally related to any unix whereas mutt is something new.
True enough. MUA choices where I work (on HP-UX systems) are Netscape
and elm only.
> People prolly are still using it. Note that mutt is NOT a user friendly
> MUA to configure at this time. If that changes mutt will have a good
Huh? It's easy enough IMHO and much more flexible than elm.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
Reply to: